Your Source for Leaks Around the World!

Declassified Documents Confirm GCHQ/MI5/MI6 Free to Eavesdrop on Communications of Lawyers/Journalists

In Archive, GCHQ, MI5, MI6, Surveillance, UK on November 7, 2014 at 1:43 PM

PDF (3MB)

11/06/2014

Ryan Gallagher/TheIntercept:

British spies have been granted the authority to secretly eavesdrop on legally privileged attorney-client communications, according to newly released documents.

On Thursday, a series of previously classified policies confirmed for the first time that the U.K.’s top surveillance agency Government Communications Headquarters has advised its employees: “You may in principle target the communications of lawyers.”

The U.K.’s other major security and intelligence agencies—MI5 and MI6—have adopted similar policies, the documents show. The guidelines also appear to permit surveillance of journalists and others deemed to work in “sensitive professions” handling confidential information.

The documents were made public as a result of a legal case brought against the British government by Libyan families who allege that they were subjected to extraordinary rendition and torture in a joint British-American operation that took place in 2004. After revelations about mass surveillance from National Security Agency whistleblower Edward Snowden last year, the families launched another case alleging that their communications with lawyers at human rights group Reprieve may have been spied on by the government, hindering their ability to receive a fair trial.

According to the documents released Thursday, in at least one case legally privileged material that was covertly intercepted by a British agency may have been used to the government’s advantage in legal cases. One passage notes that security service MI5 identified an instance in which there was potential for “tainting” a legal case after secretly intercepted privileged material apparently ended up in the hands of its lawyers.

The policies state that the targeting of lawyers “must give careful consideration to necessity and proportionality,” but the GCHQ policy document adds that each individual analyst working at the agency is “responsible for the legality” of their targeting, suggesting that a large degree of personal judgement is involved in the process. Notably, there is no judicial oversight of eavesdropping conducted by GCHQ or other British security agencies; their surveillance operations are signed off by a senior politician in government, usually the Foreign or Home Secretary.

The categories that allow the agencies to spy on lawyers or others working with “confidential” material, such as journalists, are extremely broad. One policy document from GCHQ notes:

If you wish the target the communications of a lawyer or other legal professional or other communications that are likely to result in the interception of confidential information you must:

Have reasonable grounds to believe that they are participating in or planning activity that is against the interests of national security, the economic well-being of the UK or which in itself constitutes a serious crime.

In practice, this could mean that any lawyer or an investigative journalist working on a case or story involving state secrets could be targeted on the basis that they are perceived to be working against the vaguely defined national security interests of the government.

UPDATE 02/18/2015 UK Gov’t Concedes Policies Re: Intel Agencies Snooping on Lawyer/Client Communications Unlawful, Breached ECHR

Related Links:

NSA Approved Australia’s ASD Spying on US Law Firm Involved in Indonesia Trade Talks

NSA and FBI Spying on Prominent Muslim-Americans Revealed in Snowden Docs

  1. Reblogged this on The Cryptosphere and commented:
    Congratulations, UK domestic spies! You officially have the same powers as American ones have had for years. WikiLeaks told us about that years ago. Snowden confirmed it. Clearly there will be a booming market for lawyers who are also priests who are also familiar with encryption.

  2. […] Declassified Documents Confirm GCHQ/MI5/MI6 Free to Eavesdrop on Communications of Lawyers/Journalists #WakeUp http://leaksource.info/?p=26013 […]

  3. […] A 96 page document was published last November confirming how the UK mass surveillance agency has been monitoring the correspondence, email, phone calls and other communications between lawyers and their clients for years. According to the document in at least one case legally privileged material that was covertly intercepted by a British agency may have been used to the government’s advantage in legal cases. One passage notes that security service MI5 identified an instance in which there was potential for “tainting” a legal case after secretly intercepted privileged material apparently ended up in the hands of its lawyers. (Note: The document was made public as a result of a legal case brought against the British government by Libyan families who allege that they were subjected to extraordinary rendition and torture in a joint British-American operation that took place in 2004.) […]

  4. […] A 96 page document was published last November confirming how the UK mass surveillance agency has been monitoring the correspondence, email, phone calls and other communications between lawyers and their clients for years. According to the document in at least one case legally privileged material that was covertly intercepted by a British agency may have been used to the government’s advantage in legal cases. One passage notes that security service MI5 identified an instance in which there was potential for “tainting” a legal case after secretly intercepted privileged material apparently ended up in the hands of its lawyers. (Note: The document was made public as a result of a legal case brought against the British government by Libyan families who alleged they were subjected to extraordinary rendition and torture in a joint British-American operation that took place in 2004.) […]

  5. […] the fundamental British right to a fair trial. Reprieve has been warning for months that the security services’ policies on lawyer-client snooping have been full of loopholes big enough to drive a bus […]

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: